Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Business and Commercial Law - Defences to Directors Penalty Notices

Date: October 08, 2010

Authors: LAC Lawyers

When faced with liquidity problems, it is common for companies not to make the relevant payments to the Commissioner of Taxation in regards to their tax obligations under Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. Division 9 of Part IV of the ITAA 1936 imposes a duty on Directors to cause their companies to make the payment to the Commissioner. The most common failure encountered by the Commissioner is the failure to remit the PAYE tax deductions to the Commissioner. Subdivision B of the Division 9 of the ITAA establishes a system of parallel liability which allows the Commissioner to charge company directors with payment of amounts due pursuant to the withholding tax provision of the legislation. A director of the company now is obligated to remit the payment to the Commissioner within 14 days or alternatively do one of the following 3 things:-

  1. cause the company to enter a payment arrangement with the Commissioner;
  2. appoint an Administrator; and
  3. causes the company to be wound up.

Defences for Director

A Director will not be personally liable if:

  1. The Director took reasonable steps to ensure that the company would take one of the three options above; or
  2. There were no reasonable steps that the director could take to ensure that the company complied with the above options; or
  3. The director did not participate in the management of the company for illness or some other reason.

In determining the issue of reasonableness, regards is made to the followings facts:-

  1. when, and for how long the person was a director and took part in the management of the company; and
  2. all other relevant circumstances.

The authorities make it clear that the requirement of Section 222AOJ(3) ITAA is only satisfied if the director establishes that he or she took all reasonable steps in respect of each of the three options by which the director’s duty is satisfied.

Whether the defences provided by Section 222AOJ ITAA are available to a particular director is a question of fact and the court will also consider the circumstances of the directors, their level of experience and expertise and role in the management in determining what is reasonable. We at LAC Lawyers are able to assist clients in determining whether the defences are available to them when issued with a Director Penalty Notice.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas