Employment Law - The New Fair Work Act - Consequences & The Agreement Making Process (5)
Date: August 14, 2009
Authors: Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
Welcome to our 5 Part series on The New Fair Work Act. We hope you find the series interesting and informative. You can find the rest of the series at the links below
If a workplace agreement replaces guaranteed agreement terms or conditions in a reference instrument with benefits that may or may not be realised during the life of the agreement, the Workplace Authority Director would consider these arrangements to be a reduction in the employees’ terms and conditions.
In summary, the basic rule of thumb is that the no disadvantage test will most probably be approached by being considered in a global context whereby the conditions in the new agreement will be compared to the terms and conditions lodged in the ‘reference instrument’.
Sadly, the Explanatory Memorandum does not elaborate on what information FWA or the Workplace Authority will look for.
All agreements must adhere to an agreement making process. These steps are as follows:
Step One: An employer and employee must agree to bargain. In the event that the employer does not, a union representing employees will most probably apply for good faith bargaining orders.
Step Two: Once an employer has agreed to bargain they must notify their employees of their right to be represented in bargaining and they must give their employees 14days notice.
Step Three: Employees are to be represented by their union or nominate their own representative.
Step Four: All parties to act in good faith.
Step Five: Once negotiations have been concluded an employer may request that employees vote on a proposed agreement, 21days after it issues their employees with representation notices. The employer is required to provide employees with access to the proposed agreement at least 7days prior to seeking approval of the agreement and must explain the effect to them. An agreement then is approved when a valid majority of those voting for the agreement approve the agreement. The employer is responsible for holding the vote. All agreements are to be submitted to the FWA for approval within 14days.
Either the employer or employees or union may lodge the agreement.
Step Six: FWA must be satisfied that the ‘better off overall’ test is met (as described above) as well as the NES not being undercut, in addition to the fact employees and employers were not coerced into making the agreement, and that unlawful content as described above is not expressed in an agreement.
Step Seven: All agreements that are passed must be displayed on a noticeboard and each employee must have access to a copy of it.
Step Eight: The agreement is operable from the seventh day after the date of issue of the notice by FWA advising that the agreement has passed the no disadvantage test.
OR,
Step Nine: An agreement comes to an end at the nominal expiry date. Following the commencement of the transition legislation a collective agreement may not be terminated unilaterally unless the termination is in a manner provided by the agreement for termination following its nominal date and on the provision of at least 14 days written notice to the other party to the agreement and employees covered by the agreement.
Further, a party to a collective agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date may apply to FWA for an order to terminate the agreement. FWA may make an order to terminate the agreement provided that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so.
Therefore, the key point to note in this instance is the difference between an expiry date and termination of an agreement. Under the Fair Work Act collective instruments remain in force until they are terminated.
Contact us now for Fast, Accurate and Timely legal advice
Phone LAC Lawyers on NSW 1300 799 888 or VIC 1300 734 638 or send us an email
Employment Law - Part 1 - How will the new workplace relations laws introduced on 1 July 2009 affect you?
Date: July 04, 2009
Author(s): LAC Lawyers
The introduction of new workplace relations laws through the Fair Work Act 2009 has changed employment law in Australia as we know it. The aim of the Australian Government in implementing this change is to effectively balance the various needs of employees, employers and unions with a view to ensuring Australia becoming a better country financially and guaranteeing minimum workplace standards and maintaining workplace rights.
Employment Law - The New Fair Work Act - Collective Agreements (4)
Date: August 14, 2009
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
Employment Law - The New Fair Work Act - Contracting With Employees (3)
Date: August 14, 2009
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
Essentially, with the introduction of the Fair Work Act, there are two ways in which an employer can contract with the employees in its workforce. The first is by way of common law contracts of employment. This is the subject of a separate LAC Lawyers’ article available through the website.
Employment Law - The New Fair Work Act - New National Employment Standards (2)
Date: August 14, 2009
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
Under the Fair Work Act, the new National Employment Standards provide a new national safety net, irrespective of whether or not businesses enter into a Workplace Agreement.
Employment Law - The New Fair Work Act - What Is It and What Does It Do (1)
Date: August 14, 2009
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
On Friday, 20 March 2009, the Fair Work Bill was finally passed by the Australian Senate after Family First’s Senator Fielding voted with the Government after doing a deal in relation to the unfair dismissal provisions. It received Royal Assent on 7 April 2009.
Employment Law - Unfair dismissals under the Fair Work Act
Date: April 15, 2010
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) became fully operational from 1st January 2010. The Fair Work Act changed the rights of employees and responsibilities of employers relating to dismissals.
Employment Law - Unfair dismissals under the Fair Work Act - Common Law Contracts
Date: April 15, 2010
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
Finally, common law contracts of employment will continue to regulate a large number of employment relationships under the Fair Work Act. This will continue to be the case notwithstanding the creation of ‘Modern Awards’ by the Australian Industrial Relations Tribunal since January 2010. These Modern Awards cover ten modern award conditions which are similar to the National Employment Standards that provide the basic safety net for employees.
Employment Law - Unfair dismissals under the Fair Work Act - General Protection Provisions
Date: April 15, 2010
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
The Fair Work Act incorporates general protection provisions in Part 3 – 1. This Part incorporates the type of protection provided under unfair dismissal and freedom of association provisions which was incorporated into the Work Choices legislation. The unlawful termination provisions of Work Choices have been re-enacted in Part 6 – 4 of the Fair Work Act. However, the Fair Work Act provides that a person may not apply for help against an unlawful termination if they are also entitled to challenge the dismissal under the general protection provisions.
Employment Law - Unfair dismissals under the Fair Work Act - Remedies and Entitlements
Date: April 15, 2010
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
Remedies under the Fair Work Act are largely the same as under Work Choices. Reinstatement is the primary remedy. However, Fair Work Australia’s power to reinstate has been increased to order reinstatement to ‘associated interties’ – in other words to other companies in a group.
Small Business Fair Dismissal Code - Termination Of Employment Rules For Small Business Under The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth.)
Date: July 30, 2010
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
One of the significant changes made to unfair dismissal laws by the Rudd Government under the Fair Work Act 2009 was the introduction of the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code (“the Code”). The Code included a check list for employers to complete when terminating employment. Small employers hoped that by complying with the check list, it would be easier to dismiss staff.