Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Self Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSF) - Borrowing a New Amount to Repair an SMSF Instalment Warrant Asset

Date: December 02, 2011

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

An issue raised before the ATO very recently is whether a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) is permitted to borrow a new amount to repair an instalment warrant asset it already holds.

Instalment warrant assets

As we have discussed in previous articles, an SMSF is generally prohibited from borrowing money. However, an exception is available for limited recourse borrowing arrangements (better known as instalment warrants) in which the SMSF borrows money to pay for an asset that is held in a property trust and only transferred to the SMSF when the amount is paid off.

As discussed in an earlier article, an SMSF is normally allowed to borrow an amount representing the purchase price of the asset, as well as initial repairs and maintenance on the asset (but not any improvements to the asset). The current issue is what happens if repairs are needed after the asset is already acquired.

Borrowing a new amount?

An SMSF can borrow money for the purpose of “maintaining or repairing the acquirable asset” In theory this could be interpreted to mean that a new instalment warrant could be entered into to repair an existing SMSF asset over which an instalment warrant no longer exists. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this sort of arrangement has already been entered into by some SMSFs.

ATO’s approach

The ATO has not made an official ruling on this matter, and has no plans to do so. Nevertheless, the ATO has stated clearly that it would regard such arrangements as being in breach of the prohibition on borrowing, and would not accept them as a valid instalment warrant arrangement.

Example: Repairs to an existing instalment warrant asset

A certain SMSF invests in a restaurant and guesthouse property located in Margaret River WA. It does so by borrowing an amount of money from a bank and putting the property in a property trust. The SMSF pays off twelve instalments and gets full ownership of the property.

Then the property is badly damaged in a fire in November 2011. The SMSF enters a new instalment warrant arrangement with the bank, borrowing an amount to repair the property.

In this case, the second borrowing breaches the prohibition against borrowing. The SMSF may not borrow more money to repair an instalment warrant asset if it has already paid off the instalments.

(Note that the result would be different if the property were damaged before the SMSF entered into an instalment warrant. The ATO leaves it ambiguous whether a borrowing to repair the asset would be permissible if the asset is damaged while it is still held by the property trust and the SMSF has not paid off all the instalments.)

Conclusion

If you have concerns about repair amounts and instalment warrants, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance. 

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas