Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Self Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSF) - In-specie Payments by an SMSF

Date: December 02, 2011

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

It has always been accepted that a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) can make lump sum payments in specie.

What is not so clear is what happens when a lump sum is paid as a commutation of part of a superannuation income stream. This issue, which has sometimes arisen in the past, has been brought recently before the ATO.

Superannuation lump sums

Under the superannuation legislation, an SMSF paying a superannuation income stream to a member may commute part of that income stream to a lump sum, if the member makes an election to have that happen.

Although it has been generally accepted that lump sums may be paid by an SMSF in specie, usual practice in the past has been to treat “superannuation lump sums” (commuted from income streams) as pension payments, and therefore payable only in cash.

This issue is fairly important, since at times it can be desirable for the SMSF to transfer assets to members directly, rather than subject members to the vagaries of the market by selling them and raising the cash in that way.

ATO’s approach

The ATO’s response was given as part of a taxation ruling in July 2011. Although, strangely, the ATO chose not to address the in specie issue directly, it is fairly clear from the wording that the ATO accepts that a partial or total commutation of a superannuation income stream results in a superannuation lump sum which may be paid in cash or in specie.

Example: Commutation and in specie payment

K is a member of an SMSF. She becomes eligible to receive a superannuation income stream.

K receives $3,000 a week for ten weeks under the superannuation income stream. She then becomes dissatisfied with the income stream and decides to commute part of the income stream to a lump sum.

K elects to continue to receive $1,000 per week under the income stream, but to commute the remaining portion of the income stream to a lump sum. The SMSF calculates the relevant lump sum as being $450,000. It does not have sufficient cash to pay the lump sum. It does, however, hold a property worth $420,000 located in Emu Plains NSW.

Although $420,000 is the property’s market value, the SMSF is aware that selling the property for this amount would entail some market risk as well as extra costs. Therefore, it transfers the property directly to K, as well as $30,000 in cash.

In this case, K counts as having partially commuted her income stream into a lump sum. The income stream does not count as having stopped. The lump sum is permitted to be paid in specie to K.

Conclusion

If you have concerns about SMSF benefits and lump sum commutation, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance. 

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas