Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Self Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSF) - Recording SMSF Contributions

Date: November 28, 2011

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

The Commissioner of Taxation has taken advantage of two recent cases before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) to emphasise the importance of proper record-keeping by self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs). He also emphasized the duty tax agents have to ensure that client SMSFs are not financially disadvantaged.

Deductions and SMSFs

One issue that has arisen very frequently, according to the Commissioner, is the incorrect recording of deductions for SMSF contributions. Ordinarily, SMSF contributions:

  • if contributed by an employer, may be claimed as a business expense deduction; and
  • if contributed by the member directly, may be claimed by the member as a personal superannuation contributions deduction.

Correct recording of these amounts should be as follows:

  • a contributing employer ought to claim the contribution as a business expense in the “business income and expenses” section of the income tax return; and
  • a contributing member ought to claim the contribution as a personal superannuation contributions deduction in the “supplementary deductions” section of the income tax return.

In the recent AAT case of Johnston v FC of T [2011] AATA 20, the AAT considered a situation where an SMSF member made a personal contribution, but the member’s tax agent had failed to obtain the relevant documentation at the time.

The AAT denied the deduction, but stated in obiter that the tax agent had failed to take reasonable care.

The Commissioner adds that failure to claim deductions for SMSF contributions correctly can result in additional tax liabilities and the imposition of shortfall penalties for carelessness.

Membership and intentions: excess contributions tax

In the other recent case, a taxpayer intended to introduce a second individual as member of his SMSF before the taxpayer made a contribution to the fund. Unfortunately the taxpayer’s tax agent failed to make this person a member, and therefore the taxpayer was liable to excess contributions tax (The Taxpayer v FC of T [2011] AATA 168).

The AAT found that, even though this was the result of the tax agent’s error, the taxpayer had to abide by the result. The Commissioner had to determine liability based on what actually occurred, not what the taxpayer intended to occur.

Conclusion

If you have concerns about whether your SMSF has correctly recorded contributions payments, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance.  

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas