Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Self Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSF) - SMSFs and Rectifying In-house Asset Breaches

Date: December 02, 2011

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

A non-complying self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) is open to all sorts of penalties. However, there is often some leeway for breaches, provided action is taken quickly. This article deals with the rectification of a breach of the in-house asset rule.

The in-house asset rule

Ordinarily, an SMSF is not permitted to hold in-house assets that constitute more than 5% of the value of its total value of its assets. “In-house assets” are defined as:

  • a loan to, or investment in, a related party of the SMSF (including members and their relatives);
  • an investment in a related trust of the fund; or
  • any asset of the fund subject to a lease or lease arrangement between the SMSF and a related party of the SMSF.

Rectifying a breach

When an SMSF ends up, at the end of a year, holding in-house assets that are more than the 5% limit, then under superannuation legislation the SMSF trustee is expected to provide the ATO with a written plan for the disposal, by the end of the following year, of the excess in-house assets.

Breaches caused by unstable market forces

One issue that the ATO has had to address, since the global financial crisis occurred in 2008, is that of breaches of the in-house asset rule caused purely by market forces.

There have been situations where, for instance, the SMSF has held listed shares whose value plummeted during market turmoil. This has caused the SMSF’s in-house assets to rise above 5% of the total value of the SMSF. There are even cases where market forces have caused a breach of the rule, but then “corrected” the breach before the end of the following year.

The Commissioner of Taxation has stated, in response, that:

  • where market forces have caused a breach of the in-house asset rule at year end, the SMSF trustee is still expected to complete a written plan for rectifying the breach by disposal; and
  • where market forces correct a breach of the in-house asset rule after year end, then there will be no need actually to carry out the disposal.

However, the SMSF auditor will still need to report that the self-correction occurred.

Example: Self-correction of in-house asset breach

J and K are individual trustees of their SMSF. They invest SMSF assets heavily in listed shares and foreign government bonds. They also cause the SMSF to purchase a property that is used by J and K in their business. As it happens, this property does not meet the business real property exception, and therefore constitutes an in-house asset.

However, at the time of purchase the in-house asset only makes up 2% of the total value of the SMSF. Therefore the SMSF is not in breach of the in-house asset rule.

During 2011, various economic crises in Europe and the USA cause the listed shares and government bonds to plummet in value. By 31 December 2011, the in-house asset makes up 20% of the value of the SMSF.

At this point, J and K are required to prepare a written plan for the ATO, setting out how they intend to sell the piece of real property by the end of 2012. This will cause the SMSF to have no more in-house assets at all by 31 December 2012.

However, during 2012, the economic situation improves rapidly. By 31 December 2012, the in-house asset only makes up 1% of the value of the SMSF.

In this case, J and K correctly prepared a written plan after the end of 2011, even though the breach was caused purely by market forces. They are not, however, required to sell the in-house asset, since market forces caused the in-house asset ratio to fall below 5% before the end of 2012.

Nevertheless, the SMSF auditor will still be required to report to the ATO, stating that this self-correction occurred.

Conclusion

If you have concerns about whether your SMSF has breached the in-house asset rule, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance. 

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas