Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Self Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSF) - Stepchildren and SMSF Death Benefits

Date: December 02, 2011

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

The rules applicable to self-managed superannuation funds have restrictions on who can receive cashed out member benefits. One rule is that member benefits may be cashed in favour of a member’s dependants, if the member dies.

One issue that has been raised recently is whether the ATO would accept a stepchild as the dependant of its step parent if its natural parent dies first or the pair divorce. This is apparently an issue that has already come up quite often in Australia.

Cashing of benefits

A member’s benefits may normally only be cashed in favour of the member or the member’s legal personal representative. However, if the member dies, the benefits may be cashed in favour of one or more of the member’s dependants.

A “dependant”, meanwhile, is defined in the legislation as the member’s spouse, child and any other person with whom the member has an interdependency relationship.

“Child” is defined, in turn, to include stepchildren.

The issue

Ordinarily, a stepchild would be expected to have one natural parent and one step parent. The issue is whether the stepchild is still a “child” of the step parent if its natural parent dies or gets divorced from the step parent.

ATO’s approach

The ATO has stated that, in this situation, the stepchild does indeed cease to be a “child” of the step parent upon the death or divorce of the child’s natural parent. However, the ATO also states that the stepchild might still constitute a dependant of the step parent, if the stepchild still remains in an “interdependency relationship” with the step parent.

The ATO’s statement will surprise many in the superannuation industry, since a sizable number of professionals did assume that the dependant relationship ended when the stepchild’s natural parent died or was divorced.

Example: Stepchild no longer a dependent

A, B and C are members of the same family and member-trustees of their own SMSF. B is the natural parent of C, while A is the step-parent of C.

When C is 12 years old and totally dependent on his parents, B dies. B’s member benefits are cashed in favour of C, as her natural son.

Ten years later, A dies. The SMSF cashes A’s member benefits in favour of C, as his dependent.

By this time, however, C is 22 years old and totally independent of A.

In this situation, the first cashing was correctly done, since C was unquestionably a “child” of B as her natural son.

However, by the time of the second cashing, C is no longer the “child” of A, as B has died. Further, since C is no longer in an interdependency relationship with A, he is also no longer a “dependant” of A.

Therefore A’s member benefits cannot be cashed in favour of C.

(Note that the situation would have been different if A had died sooner).

Conclusion

If you have concerns about SMSF benefits and stepchildren, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance. 

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas