Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Anti-Avoidance Rules - Income Tax, GST, FBT

Date: March 28, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

 

Schemes or Arrangements

There are a number of anti-avoidance provisions in the Tax Acts, their purpose being to nullify schemes or arrangements which are damaging the revenue. Whenever any such schemes or scams are identified by the Tax Office they not only look at their legal advisers but at all promoters, professionals and participants.

Part IVA of ITAA 1936 is principally directed to income tax, deductions and capital losses. Division 165 of the GST Act 1999 is principally directed at GST, wine taxes and luxury car tax. Section 67 of FBTAA 1986 focus is Fringe Benefits Tax and provides the ATO with broad anti-avoidance powers similar to those under Part IVA.

What they all share in common is they focus on schemes or arrangements which are structural in nature and damage the Australian revenue base. Each will briefly be taken in turn but the effect of these anti-avoidance rules is to nullify all such schemes or arrangements including any advantage gained subjecting them to the full range of penalties as well as punitive rates of interest.

There are a wide range of penalties which can be imposed many of which involve Div.7A where companies and/or trusts may be involved even though there may be interposed entities. As for interest it can be imposed as GIC, the Shortfall Interest charge or Base Rate. The Tax Office has said on their website that GIC is to be deducted in the year in which it is incurred. This statement is often misunderstood with the financial consequences varying substantially.

Although these anti-avoidance rules focus on schemes or arrangements the operative words under Part IVA ITAA 1936 and Division 165 of the GST Act 1999 is the operation of a scheme whereas under Section 67 of FBTAA 1986 if we are talking about an arrangement. Irrespective all these anti-avoidance measures are against the obtaining of an unjustified tax benefit which damages the revenue.

Although much greater material has been produced about FBT this is only because it has become an area of current interest to the ATO due to the level of tax non-compliance in this area. In no way does this detract from the importance of Part IVA ITAA 1936 or Division 165 of the GST Act 1999.


  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas