Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Be wary of what you affirm in your Tax Objection to the Commissioner

Date: March 25, 2011

Authors: Tony Anamourlis B.A., LL.B., MTaxLaw, GradDipLegPrac, SJD Candidate (La Trobe); ATIA

In a recent case of Saxby v R [2011] TASCCA, the Commissioner was successful in prosecuting a taxpayer for making misleading statements which were not accurate made on his tax objections. He was convicted of the offences, namely defrauding and making misleading statements which were untrue to two years in jail.

Taxpayers under these circumstances should be very mindful about what they state on their tax objections and or are seeking to lodge an objection with respect for the remission of penalties and interest. As the case reflects, a statement made in a notice of objection, which is found to be false and or misleading to the Commissioner, could lead to a criminal conviction and possibly a term of imprisonment.

Background

The brief facts are as follows;

The taxpayers conducted a bakery business with his wife. In the course of running the business it was stated that a $1,000 was isolated from the cash takings of the business for the taxpayer's personal use but not declared as income on his tax return. As a result of this repetition, the ATO commenced an audit for the relevant income years, being 1992 through to 1995 inclusive. An audit also commenced on his trust from 1994 to 1995.

The prosecution's evidence was sustained in that the then taxpayers spouse admitted to taking the monies which were applied for personal expenses. In addition, other employees of the taxpayers business also gave evidence that the taxpayer was in the practice of taking cash from the til and not declaring this as income.  

The taxpayer had to say this in his objection;

“the total amount of income earned, received or derived by the Trust during the income year was properly and accurately recorded in its weekly sales sheets and returned as gross income in calculating the net income of the trust estate ... for the income year.”

The taxpayer proclaimed that the amount of the additional income was not earned, received or derived during the income year.

The Tasmanian Court of Appeal went on to say that under the Tax Administration Act it imposes obligations on taxpayers to declare facts in any notice of objection that are not false and or misleading. Accordingly, to assert that income was “properly and accurately recorded in weekly sales sheets” was found to be in breach of the Tax Administration Act thus allowing the taxpayer afterwards being charged under the Crimes Act 1914.

Lessons for Taxpayers

This is the first reported case where the Commissioner has successfully prosecuted a taxpayer for making a false statement. The reality of the matter is, not only does the taxpayer still have to pay the tax owing to the Commissioner; he has a criminal conviction and was sent to jail.

The fact of the matter is that all taxpayers need to ensure that all communications to the Commissioner must be true and accurate, which must be supported by documentary evidence.

If you're faced with this type of situation, you should immediately seek legal advice. We will give you the right advice at LAC Lawyers. You can contact Mr Frank Egan at LAC Lawyers to discuss your options.

LAC Lawyers is a specialist boutique tax law firm. We encourage you to contact us for any tax related advice.


  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas