Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Cash Economy - Data Matching - Privacy - Pursuing Tax Offenders

Date: November 24, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

The government founded the Australian Taxation Office for one primary reason: to collect taxes and tax-related liabilities. The ATO has the responsibility to ensure that every taxpayer pays the correct amount of tax and excise under the law. That said, the ATO has been given power to pursue individuals and entities who are not complying with their tax-related responsibilities including those who provide false information.

One way by which the ATO is able to accomplish this is through verification programs like data matching. Data matching allows information from a variety of sources to be brought together. This allows the ATO to identify and pursue tax offenders, especially businesses who participate in the cash or underground economy, at a far faster and more efficient rate.

Privacy

Every person’s privacy is protected by the Privacy Act 1988 and secrecy provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, the Taxation Administration Act and other tax laws. An example of this protocol aimed at protecting an entity’s privacy is limiting access to information to authorised staff only. That said, the protection afforded under these laws will be reduced if a taxpayer is found to be guilty of tax evasion by having a businesses that participates in the cash economy.

Generally, the ATO would prefer taxpayers to come forward of their own volition before having to institute action to compel them to respond. An entity will be notified first and given the chance to correct their errors and if any are found they can use the Correcting tax errors form. The ATO will also inform the entity of their rights and obligations including any penalties they may incur. However there are some instances where the ATO will not inform the taxpayer as it may affect the viability of the audit. If the entity still refuses to cooperate, then the ATO may take further action to gather further information. In most cases, the entity will be informed that information will be gathered from a third party except in special circumstances where the ATO concludes that documents which are relevant to the matter will be destroyed.

Failure to Cooperate

Taxpayers are at risk where there is a:

  • refusal or failure to provide a tax return or information, or to produce records or documents
  • refusal or failure to meet with a Tax Officer or answer questions
  • hinder or obstruct the ATO when using access powers

In all of these cases they are targets for the ATO and will be dealt with harshly including referring them for criminal prosecution.

Acquisition of Data

Traditional sources of data which are used for cross-referencing are:

  • investment and income information from banks, financial institutions and other investment bodies(e.g. trusts and funds)
  • employment information and welfare payments
  • other government agencies

Discrepancies

Many non-complying taxpayers believe they will never be caught irrespective of what they do. For example, imagine you were a client with four children whose wife was claiming Centrelink benefits, owning millions of dollars worth of property, running a very substantial company which never declared a profit, failed to lodge its BAS accumulating tax debts, taking at least five overseas holidays per year with wife and children, having replaced over 23 cars in the last 15 years, some of which were exotics, currently driving a late model Ferrari and only declaring $13,500 per annum. Wouldn’t you think you were a target?

Obviously there are a number of taxpayers who have trespassed into this area and although they have not been contacted yet they are prime targets. It is worth remembering that most high profile tax cases arise because taxpayers are regularly dobbed in by disaffected associates who have a grievance against a particular taxpayer. In other words, all non-complying taxpayers are at risk of investigation, audit or examination. Do not forget the Ronen Case. If you have a significant tax problem contact LAC Lawyers now for professional advice and assistance.  

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas