Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Debt Recovery - Overpayments

Date: November 15, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

In the normal course of things taxpayers account to the tax office for tax monies to satisfy their tax related liabilities. But there are instances in which a person may receive money from the ATO which is in excess of their entitlements to a refund or otherwise. Where this occurs the monies received fall under Section 8AAZN of the TAA 1953 as an administrative overpayment. That is an amount the commissioner has paid to a person by mistake being an amount to which the person is not entitled.

In addition there are other sums of money which are received by taxpayers where they have manipulated the tax system to obtain a fraudulent refund as where they have manipulated business activity statements. Many businesses have seen this as a short term funding mechanism where cashflows have been imperilled during the course of the GFC by an overall downturn in business. The same applies to the fuel tax rebates scheme where significant businesses have been rorting the system for a long period of time treating these rebates as cheap substitute bank finance. In both of these instances taxpayers and their directors are at risk of being criminally prosecuted.

Where the commissioner becomes aware of an administrative overpayment which was paid to  the taxpayer he will give notice to the recipient with respect to the overpaid amount and the specific due date for payment which will be at least 30 days after notice is given. Where the recipient has not contacted the ATO and informed them of the overpayment they will be levied with the general interest charge where they are unable to repay the amount involved which will continue to accrue for the full period during which monies remain unpaid.

Administrative overpayments can generally be categorised into two broad groups which are mistakes made by the commissioner and mistakes made by the taxpayer and/or their representative.

Mistakes by the commissioner

Administrative overpayments made by the commissioner may be attributed to:

  • Incorrect keying of amount
  • Incorrect calculation of refund of interest entitlements
  • System and accounting errors
  • Crediting of an electronic refund to an incorrect bank account

Mistakes by the taxpayer and/or their representative

Administrative overpayments can largely occur as a result of false and misleading statements or fraud. Example of false and misleading statements is when an entity intentionally understates their activity statement liability or overstates their activity statement credits. Whereas a fraudulent claim is where an entity intentionally induces a course of action by deceit or other dishonest acts to make false oral or written statements to obtain money from the Commonwealth or to avoid paying for any such liability.

Sometimes taxpayers represent they actually propose a scheme which is designed to lower the incidence of tax or obtain refunds or credits etc which would not otherwise be available at law. Because these schemes depend upon the tax office not discovering them many taxpayers believing that they can bury in a mountain of detail these activities. In some instances false invoices are raised by individuals, companies or entities, monies may be kept onshore or sent offshore, these entities may or may not be controlled by the taxpayer or by others who are closely associated with them and on whom they rely to substantiate that the transactions involved are legitimate including any tax invoices which have been raised.

Once the ATO becomes aware of the situation they normally send a letter to the taxpayer with a Notice of intention to audit and ask for a number of documents be provided to them allowing them to test whether or not the taxpayer has legitimately incurred expenses or has grounds to seek a refund. Once they obtain this information they will definitely make enquiries to ascertain the validity of those documents provided. Administrative overpayments resulting from mistake by the tax office is one thing but where payments received from the tax office have been procured by fraud then these taxpayers are in the worse possible situation and unless they obtain proper counsel their situation can only be described as bleak. Where you have incurred a significant tax liability for any reason including fraud or evasion call LAC Lawyers now for professional advice and assistance.

 

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas