Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Income Tax - Part IVA ITAA 1936 - General Anti-Avoidance Rules

Date: March 28, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

Part IVA is extremely dangerous as it has far reaching consequences and could potentially cover anything or everything done by the taxpayer(s) or their advisers. It was devised to address arrangements devised for the sole or dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit. Although a number of commentators construe this differently we consider “dominant” to mean “principal” but this is subject to some exceptions. Part IVA is provision of last resort and only applies where the taxpayer’s claim is otherwise allowable.

For Part IVA to apply:-

  1. there must be a Scheme;
  2. it must post date 27/05/1981; and
  3. its sale or dominant purpose must be to obtain a tax benefit.

It would be fair to say that Part IVA is starting to be used more often particularly where circumstances are uncovered by review, audit or investigation.

All these elements operate contiguously and where they are found to exist the Commissioner may exercise his discretion to either:-

  1. fully assess the taxpayer;
  2. disallow all relevant deductions; and
  3. disallow any capital loss or foreign tax credit.

Under Part IVA the Tax Office has wider powers to amend assessments and disallow a tax benefit generally within four years of the date the tax became due and payable. (S.70 ITAA 36). Where the arrangement would not have proceeded without the tax benefit it is highly likely that it would be struck down by the courts. Where an assessment pre-dates the’05 tax year it must be amended within six years of the date on which it became due and payable.

It is worthy of note that schemes aimed at reducing assessable income or increasing the level of deductions claimed may well fall foul of Part IVA which is to be distinguished from under-declared income and over-claimed deductions. Remember, there is a distinction to be borne in mind between honest and reasonable mistake and fraud and evasion with very different consequences.

Part IVA has been extended to schemes directed to the non-payment of withholding tax on non-resident interest, dividend and royalty payments. Interposed entities are often used to do this the benefit being the amount of the non-payment of the withholding tax. Part IVA is to be extended to certain employee benefit arrangements including trust and salary deferral arrangements and employee saving plans.

Part IVA matters require serious consideration by independent tax professionals who understand the intricacies of this highly involved and complex area of tax law. Part IVA does not apply to schemes which are a legal nullity i.e. sham transactions. Vended schemes are rarely legitimate and where they rely for their efficacy on some form of cloak or disguise all participants are in for a serious hiding. Just because the scheme or the scheme promoter says it is legitimate this means nothing. Taxpayers will not be excused from the consequences of having entered into these schemes.

In one such case in which we were asked to advise clients the scheme’s tax adviser pointed out to them that if they dealt with billions of their intellectual property by laundering it through various jurisdictions they would receive all the sale proceeds tax free. Our advice was to avoid this scheme even more so because the tax adviser involved was not prepared to provide a written opinion verifying the advice given. Be prudent and obtain proper written legal advice from a tax lawyer otherwise you have nothing on which you can rely.

Tax is a very difficult area of the law and if any taxpayer is at risk then they should immediately retain LAC Lawyers Pty Ltd to advise and represent them.


  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas