Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Tax Debt - Disputed Debts - Legal Action

Date: November 10, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

The ATO believes that the longer a tax debt remains in dispute the harder it is to recover. Disputed debt will normally increase due to the application of penalties and interest as long as the debt remains outstanding or a suitable payment arrangement has not been made by the debtor.

Matters to be considered when evaluating the risk posed by Disputed Debts:

  • the subject matter of the dispute
  • whether the subject matter of the dispute is dependent on the test case litigation programme (TCLP) wherein the disputed debt may not be collected until the case is resolved
  • whether the tax debtor has outstanding undisputed tax i.e. is otherwise compliant
  • a minimum of 50% of the disputed tax has been paid, reducing the GIC the perceived  risk as it shows good faith on behalf of the debtor
  • the level of cooperation of the debtor which offer indicates the debtors commitment to resolving the tax debt
  • whether the dispute is frivolous, and therefore the debtor is only playing for time
  • whether there is any evidence of dissipation of the debtor's assets which is an indication of high risk which may compel the ATO to take immediate legal action to recover the debt
  • whether there is any evidence to suggest that the debtor's assets have been transferred or held in the name of other entities, indicating a high risk situation

If the ATO concludes that a debtor is a high risk, then legal action will be taken according to the circumstances of the case. For corporate debtors, the Commissioner may issue a writ or a statutory demand under section 459E of the Corporation Act 2001. That section states that the company is required to pay the total amount of debt or to secure or compound the amount to the creditor's reasonable satisfaction within 21 days of the demand being served on the company.

A disputed debt will continue to accrue interest at the statutory rate regardless whether the debtor applies for a stay of execution to delay recovery action with proceedings. With companies the tax debtor should only approach the court for such an order where there are genuine grounds for dispute. There are no genuine grounds for dispute where default assessments have been raised under Section 177(1) of ITAA1936 as the notices of assessment are conclusive proof of the existence of the debt.

Conclusion:

Delay is the enemy of the taxpayer. The ATO requires a demonstration of good faith. They want to see some evidence of a genuine attempt to quantify and pay the debt owed. They are getting tougher and do not like large tax debts particularly where they have been unearthed by review, audit or investigation. In all such cases where the taxpayers are approached by the Tax Office they should seek proper professional advice and assistance.

Be extremely careful where there has been fraud or evasion particularly where your affairs have been handled by an accountant (as they often think they are the promoter of a taxation exploitation scheme).

Where an accountant has been used where this type of activity has been detected it means absolutely nothing as the Tax Office suspects both the accountant and taxpayer alike until they know otherwise. Irrespective the taxpayer is the one who is caught and bears the tax liability. Remember you do not get the benefit of Legal Professional Privilege where you use an accountant. Contact LAC lawyers now for professional advice and assistance where you are in this situation.

  

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas