Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Tax Debts - Liquidation

Date: October 19, 2011

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

When the ATO and Commissioner of Taxation decide to impose measures upon a company taxpayer with a tax debt, the most extreme sanction available is that of liquidation. As can be imagined, this harsh measure is not imposed lightly.

When it is imposed

First, if a tax debt exists, the Commissioner will usually request that the debtor propose, or adhere to a proposal, to repay the debt in a way acceptable to the ATO. If the debtor fails to obey this request, the Commissioner engages in legal recovery proceedings.

Only if the debt remains unpaid even after these legal proceedings will the Commissioner and ATO even consider imposing liquidation upon the debtor.

When the debtor company is placed into liquidation, its assets pass to the liquidator. The liquidator will then realise these assets and use the proceeds to deal with the company’s debts, giving appropriate priority to the tax debt that caused the issue.

Factors considered by the Commissioner

The Commissioner’s options short of liquidation include entering an arrangement with the debtor. The ATO regards this as a better result than liquidation, since the taxpayer’s tax debt would be settled more rapidly and thoroughly.

If the debtor is solvent the Commissioner will never seek liquidation. However, the taxpayer has the onus of proving solvency. Mere surplus of assets over liabilities will not suffice; rather, the taxpayer is expected to present clear evidence that the tax debts can be paid off by their due dates, as well as showing that all its other debts are likely to be paid off.

The Commissioner’s options when considering liquidation also include the issuing of director penalty notices before seeking liquidation, but only if the debt is a withholding tax amount. Such notices permit entry into a payment arrangement. Another possibility is deciding to liquidate the debtor company if it has also been trading insolvent, but only if insolvent trading is apparent.

Note that our companion article Bankruptcy and liquidation factors looks more closely at the factors considered when the Commissioner is deciding whether to liquidate. Further, our article Tax debt recovery and company arrangements in lieu of liquidation covers possible company arrangements if liquidation is imposed.

Example: The decision to liquidate a taxpayer

B Co buys and sells antiques. Its two directors, C and D, have difficulties running B Co’s accounting software. Unknown to them, their computer has been hacked. As a result, B Co’s accountants cannot keep track of its cash flow, and B Co fails to lodge BASs during 2011/12.

This results in a large withholding tax debt. The Commissioner writes to B Co suggesting repayment of the debt in instalments. B Co agrees to this but fails to keep up with instalments due to further software problems. The Commissioner initiates prosecution against B Co, which is successful. B Co is required to pay the debt under a new instalment arrangement. However, B Co cannot even make these payments.

Finally, the Commissioner considers whether to impose liquidation on B Co. B Co has failed to demonstrate solvency. However, the tax debt at issue is a withholding tax debt. Therefore the Commissioner issues a director penalty notice to C and D. They choose to enter another payment arrangement and this time B Co keeps up with it.

Conclusion

The Commissioner’s decision to impose liquidation is as unusual as a decision to bankrupt an individual. Nevertheless it does happen. LAC Lawyers is fully capable of assisting you if a tax debt liquidation action threatens or has been commenced.

 

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas