Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Tax Havens

Date: February 20, 2012

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

The mere fact that a taxpayer has overseas assets, income and bank accounts is not illegal. Similarly the use of a tax haven for a legitimate business enterprise or other purpose is not illegal provided there is transparency with respect to these overseas dealings and no attempt is made to hide an/or conceal the true nature of what is occurring. Although the ATO does not like tax havens there are a number of major commercial enterprises in Australia, including Telstra who have used them. This could be for any number of reasons. Sometimes it is because they are a financial hub which relies on access to the financial markets without incurring the transactional costs normally associated with this. In other words, the primary purpose of the enterprise is not to evade or conceal income or assets as it is strictly for a legitimate business purpose.

Tax Havens

The number of tax havens around the word varies at any one time. Over recent years they have been subject to immense pressure by a number of OECD countries given the high level of tax leakage which has been occurring. Over many years tax havens have been used to hide or conceal income or assets of which major revenue authorities have been aware. Originally money was sent to an overseas tax haven in the guise of a payment for goods or services for which a deduction was claimed. Since then matters have become more sophisticated.

Many of these arrangements relied upon them not being discovered for their efficacy. The ATO, like other OECD revenue authorities looks at two factors when determining whether a tax haven is a secrecy haven:

  1. lack of transparency;

  2. lack of effective information exchange

Oppressive political regimes like South Africa and others have ensured the success of tax havens. Switzerland has been a favourite with worldwide Jewry. Organised crime has been another solid supporter of tax havens as have a number of terrorist groups. The key to their success has been bank secrecy.

Lack of Transparency

The ATO, like other revenue authorities, does not like situations where legal arrangements involving taxpayers are not open to financial scrutiny where the true financial position cannot be readily determined. Secrecy, concealment, secrecy rulings and negotiated tax rates are considered to hinder transparency and often cause the ATO to examine the taxpayer’s affairs in far greater detail where information is discovered and these arrangements are likely to exist.

Lack of Effective Information Exchange

Lack of effective information exchange between jurisdictions and their respective tax administrations including their banking system is often a cause of great concern to the ATO and other OECD revenue authorities. Bank secrecy laws do not assist as they are obviously there to hinder taxation authorities from determining the true position with respect to its taxpayers’ affairs. They are regularly justified based on privacy concerns but this strikes a hollow cord today.

Some types of Illegal Tax Schemes

The following devices have often been used to conceal a taxpayer’s overseas income and assets:

  1. Foreign Trusts;

  2. Offshore Private Annuities;

  3. Offshore Bank Accounts;

  4. Related Party Transactions;

  5. Private Investment Companies;

  6. Legacies;

  7. Insurance Claims paid overseas;

  8. Offshore Service Arrangements;

  9. Some Special Purpose Trusts;

  10. Overseas Foundations;

  11. Some Mutual Fund Arrangements.

Taxation Administration and Money Laundering

Not all tax havens are tax-free jurisdictions with some charging local taxes with no tax on taxpayer’s worldwide income or assets. In other words, local tax is paid which is normally a fraction of the taxpayer’s worldwide income and, as overseas assets not picked up they are not subject to capital gains tax. These arrangements are extremely advantageous and discriminate against the modern day state which requires revenue to function effectively.

One thing on which nearly all tax administrations agree is that where money laundering occurs then access and information exchange will normally be granted. All jurisdictions recognize that something needs to be done to stamp out crime and terrorism and the best way to do this is through the financial system by focusing on money laundering to prevent the banking system being used as a financing mechanism for these activities.

Conclusion

Where any taxpayer experiences any problems with their taxation affairs such that they are likely to come to the attention of the ATO or any other revenue authority in the world then they should contact LAC Lawyers now for proper professional advice and assistance in an attempt to mitigate the worse aspects of what has occurred. It should always be borne in mind that where the amount of tax avoided exceeds approximately $80,000 then it is always open to the ATO to refer the non-compliant taxpayer(s) for investigation and subsequent prosecution should the circumstances justify it. 

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas