Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Tax havens(Part 2)

Date: February 22, 2012

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

Non-abuse

The ATO acknowledges that there are dealings involving tax havens that are not abusive. The following are forms of dealing about which the ATO has expressed general unconcern:

  • “genuine” gifts from family members who are resident in tax havens;

  • earnings from overseas services which, even though derived by Australian residents, are exempt from Australian income tax;

  • transfer of assets to Australia when the owner of the assets is migrating to Australia; or

  • investing in real property located in a tax haven.

Discerning abuse from non-abuse

To assess whether an entity’s tax haven dealings constitute tax haven abuse, the entity ought to take the following into account:

  • whether the activities aim to create deductions to which the taxpayer is not entitled;

  • whether the activities conceal assets to avoid Australian taxation; and

  • whether the taxpayer intends to move the untaxed amount and let it accumulate offshore.

Marketing claims

A lot of taxpayers are drawn in to tax haven schemes that are marketed by promoters. Taxpayers should be wary of marketing claims such as:

  • a seemingly elaborate concern for confidentiality and concealment, often in the guise of wanting to protect commercially confidential ideas;

  • a warning not to ask the ATO about the scheme;

  • promises to “protect” your money, which involves in any way concealment of money or obfuscatory market structures;

  • promises that the structure will prevent the ATO from tracing money back to you; and

  • promises of exceedingly high returns on the scheme, sometimes 25% monthly.

Examples

The following are actual examples of tax haven schemes that the ATO and other government bodies have shut down.

Example 1: Tax haven structures prepared before migration to Australia

There have been several cases of persons, resident in a tax haven, who contemplate a migration to Australia, and even at this early stage start setting up a tax haven structure. Such structures can include trusts and anstalts. When the person becomes a resident of Australia, they can use the tax haven entity to accumulate income, for example.

In some cases, taxpayers have co-operated in winding up the overseas entity and bringing the assets back to Australia, or helping the ATO to “unwind” the tax haven structure. In both cases penalties can be reduced.

Example 2: Promoted structures

ASIC investigated a financial planner who accepted fees for teaching a bank’s clients how to invest in a Bahamas company. He lied to the clients by telling them that the Bahamas company was associated with a well-known international bank. However, the funds were actually being diverted to the promoter’s own company for a series of failed investments.

Example 3: Sending funds overseas

Another case involved an Australian resident individual, who set up several Vanuatu trusts and bank accounts. He ran a business in Australia, but he sent the funds overseas to Vanuatu using a false name. The Vanuatu structures then sent the funds back to Australia in a non-taxable form.

The individual was caught when the regularity of the movement of funds offshore, even using a false name, aroused suspicion.

Risks of engaging in tax haven abuse

We have already seen, in part 1 of this article, the potential penalties that can apply to entities making illegal use of tax haven schemes. Briefly, though, the ATO sets out the risks for taxpayers as follows:

  • as can be seen from example 2 above, promoters of tax haven schemes are often also scamming the persons using their schemes. Lack of consumer or legal protection means that this opens the Australian individual up to losing a great deal of money;

  • amended assessments of tax, interest charges and administrative penalties can apply to the individual;

  • prosecution for tax evasion, fraud and money laundering are also possible; and

  • it is also possible for assets to be confiscated if they were connected with criminality.

At any rate, the ATO emphasises that voluntary disclosure and co-operation with the authorities can lead to substantial reductions of negative consequences.

Conclusion

If you have concerns about tax haven penalties and prosecutions, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas