Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Unfair preference payment claims against the ATO

Date: January 07, 2012

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

This article deals with a little-known form of action that may be taken against the ATO by a liquidator – namely, an unfair preference payment claim against the ATO itself.

Unfair preference payment claims

Liquidation occurs when a company goes insolvent; ie, becomes unable to pay its debts. The company’s assets and affairs are taken over by a liquidator, who must use the company’s assets to pay off the creditors of the company in order of their priority.

If a liquidator finds that the company had, whilst insolvent, entered into transactions favouring one unsecured creditor at the expense of others, then this constitutes a preference. The liquidator may make an unfair preference payment claim against the favoured creditor.

Claims against the ATO

Unbeknownst to many, the ATO is not immune to such a claim from a liquidator. Like other creditors, the ATO may be required to pay back amounts and/or assets in relation to payment of tax liabilities, should the liquidator provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claim.

Note that, while the most common voidable transaction claim against the ATO is in relation to unfair preference payments, liquidators may also claim voidable transactions as a result of the following:

  • non-commercial transactions;
  • insolvent transactions; and
  • unreasonable transactions.

New power to settle

Since 1 March 2011, the ATO has had the power to settle all such claims against it, without the bother of acquiring a court order, provided the ATO is satisfied that the claim is proven. This means that the ATO, if it acknowledges that the claim is proven, can repay amounts more quickly and cheaply than was formerly the case.

Elements of a preference claim

Generally, there are four elements to a preference claim against the ATO, which are:

  • insolvency of the company;
  • parties to the transaction;
  • excessive nature of the payment; and
  • the date of the payment.

Element one: Insolvency

The payment to the ATO must have occurred whilst the company was already insolvent, or else the company must have become insolvent because of the transaction. The ATO recommends using the cash flow test to prove this point. The liquidator must provide evidence to prove the insolvency. It is not strictly necessary to present the ATO with an insolvency report.

Element two: Parties

The unfair preference payment must have been made by the company to the ATO. Evidence may include bank statements and cheques records.

Element three: Excess payment

The payment must have resulted in the ATO receiving more than would have been the case had the ATO wound up the company. Proving this may involve reviewing the payment history of the company with the other creditors.

Element four: Date

The transaction must, finally, have been entered into within 6 months of the relation-back day or, if this is not met, the day before the winding up day.

Conclusion

If you have concerns about unfair preference claims against the ATO, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas