Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Value Shifting Essentials (Part 2)

Date: February 21, 2012

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

Indirect Value Shifting

How it happens

Indirect value shifting happens when two parties under the same ownership engage in a transaction and:-

  • neither entity is part of the same consolidated group;

  • the arm’s length principle is not applied;

  • the market value is not used.

For example, an indirect value shift happens when two entities transfer assets and either the amount of payment given by one entity is not equal to the market value of the asset acquired or no payment is made at all.

ATO response

To prevent artificial losses and gains, both entities have to choose either of the following to address the situation:

  • reduce losses and gains for the losing entity and gaining entity respectively (realization time method); or

  • amend the adjustable values for both the losing and gaining entity (adjustable value method).

Realisation Time Method

Under this method any loss and gain made by the two entities involved in the transaction is reduced to the extent that both could reasonably reflect the values of the assets upon later realization of the artificially made gains and losses.

Adjustable Value Method

Under this method any loss and gain made by the two entities involved in the transaction will be reduced by an amount that reflects the market value of both assets with respect to the value shift.

Exclusions

The GVSR provision for indirect value shifting will not apply if any of the following conditions apply:

  • the value shift is less than $50,000

  • the entity owning or controlling the two transacting parties is a small business; or

  • the entity has less than $6M of total assets (for the income years following 2007-08)

  • the entity has less than $5M of total assets (for the 2006-07 and earlier income years)

  • the entity that owns the two parties is not a company or trust

  • the entity is a superannuation entity

  • the assets involved were dealt in a commercially realistic price; or

  • the cost base of the assets involved was the amount paid for in the transaction.

Conclusion

Should you anticipate that you may have a CGT problem contact LAC Lawyers now for proper professional advice and assistance.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas