Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Tax Law - Widely based tax disputes(Part 3)

Date: January 12, 2012

Authors: Jonathan Lim B.A., LL.B. (Hons)

This part of this article looks at the principles that the ATO uses when assessing a settlement proposal relating to a widely-based tax dispute.

Factors

If a group of taxpayers wish to approach the ATO with a widely based tax dispute and a settlement proposal, it can be relevant to know the factors the ATO takes into account when assessing proposals.
 
There are five general factors taken into consideration, both by the ATO’s decision-maker and the advisory Panel, when assessing a proposal for settlement of widely-based dispute. These are as follows.

Cost and effect

The officers and Panel will look to the cost to Commonwealth revenue of the settlement proposal. Relevant here are losses to revenue and the savings involved in avoiding litigation.
 
They will also examine how the settlement would affect compliance attitudes amongst the participant taxpayers as well as in the community generally. Particularly relevant is whether, in situations of aggressive tax planning, the proposal would be appropriate to the tax mischief that was committed.
Circumstances
The officers and Panel will look to the circumstances of the affected taxpayers, including the circumstances when the taxpayers entered the original arrangement, how the arrangement was executed, whether the participants relied upon professional advice, and the ability of participants to implement any settlement proposal.
 
The ATO also expects consideration to be made of the taxpayers’ compliance histories, whether they were the target of scheme-promoters or were misled by others, whether the relevant law was rather uncertain and whether the ATO already provided information to the participants on the arrangement.
 
Justifiability
 
The officers and Panel will also look at how justified the settlement proposal is, particularly when compared with similar past settlements. The ATO desires consistency in similar settlements and appropriate differentiations when circumstances differ. All settlements ought to reflect community expectations and confidence.
 
This includes taking into account taxpayers who are not participants in the specific dispute but who may be affected by the outcome.
 
Litigation
 
The officers and Panel will examine whether the ATO already has a settled view on the relevant circumstances. They will also look at what outcome there has been to any litigation relating to the disputed arrangement.
 
Conclusion

If you have concerns about widely based tax disputes, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas