Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Taxation Law - ATO and ASIC Crackdown On Phoenix Activity

Date: August 02, 2010

Authors: Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.

On 1 July 2010, amendments to tax and corporations laws gave the ATO new powers against fraudulent Phoenix activity.

What is fraudulent phoenix activity?

Fraudulent Phoenix activity is typically associated with a company director who:

  • Transfers the assets of an indebted company into a new company of which they are also a director;
  • The director then places the initial company into administration or liquidation with no assets left to pay the debts of the failed company, which can include tax liabilities, wages, superannuation and leave entitlements, supplier accounts and other business debts; and
  • Then continue the business using the new company structure with no intention of paying back the unpaid creditors of the first entity.

The ATO had claimed that fraudulent Phoenix activity was costing the economy between $1 billion and $2.4 billion annually.

New legislation gives the ATO more power to combat fraudulent Phoenix activity

As and from 1 July 2010, new legislation has been passed granting the ATO new powers to combat fraudulent Phoenix activity. Those powers enable the ATO to demand “security deposits” for existing and future tax debts if the ATO suspects the business involved may be a risk of becoming a Phoenix – where, for example, a company’s director has had a poor record of paying its tax bills.   The power enables the ATO to require a company to provide an appropriate tax bond where it is reasonable to expect that the company would be unable to meet its tax obligations and/or would engage in fraudulent Phoenix activity.

The security deposits are uncapped. This means that the ATO can demand as much as the ATO considers reasonable.   These changes are designed to enable the Commissioner of Taxation ensure that taxpayers cannot avoid their tax liabilities. The changes are designed to limit the effectiveness of tax avoidance schemes like Phoenix activity. The penalty for non-compliance with a requirement to provide security has also been significantly increased for individuals from 20 penalty units ($2,200.00) to 100 penalty units ($11,000.00) and for companies from 100 penalty units ($11,000.00) to 500 penalty units ($55,000.00).  

Additonal powers of the ATO over taxpayers

The additional powers of demanding security deposits given to the ATO will also apply to situations such as:

  • Where a taxpayer plans to temporarily carry on an enterprise in Australia and then leave without returning;
  • Where the taxpayer has a history of non-compliance including by defaulting upon their tax liabilities;
  • Where the directors of a corporate taxpayer have a history of non-compliance; and
  • Where the Commissioner is granting a taxpayer the benefit of a payment arrangement for outstanding tax liabilities.

These new laws are draconian and could couch small to medium enterprises that are behaving honestly but are having cash flow problems.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas