Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Taxation Law - Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI) - The Current Status of the ATO Concerning Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance

Date: May 04, 2010

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary), Tony Anamourlis B.A., LL.B., MTaxLaw, GradDipLegPrac, SJD Candidate (La Trobe); ATIA

From a government perspective, there is some concern that proceeds of crime have become associated with fraud, tax evasion and other criminal activity. For example, in 2005-06, the ATO’s Serious Non-Compliance Department achieved the following:

  • 367 investigations;
  • 178 briefs of evidence referred to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP);
  • 107 matters dealt with by the courts, with 102 resulting in successful prosecutions, of which 56% were prison sentences; and
  • 363 audits finalised, resulting in adjustments of $121.4 million.
 More recent update of results as at 28 February 2010[1]
Investigations
Audits (including risk reviews)
Tax liabilities raised
$573.46m
 
Audits (including reviews) in progress
665
 
Audits (including reviews) completed
1167
Criminal Investigations
In progress
26
Prosecutions
 
People charged
57
 
Convictions
6
Monies recouped
 
Tax collections
$174.27m
 
Tax collections in subsequent years from people subject to Wickenby action (compliance dividend)
$299.33m
 
Other moneys recouped
$5.92m
 
TOTAL
$479.52m

Furthermore, federal legislation has been introduced to deal with this issue. Proceeds arising from criminal offences against federal laws may be forfeited. However, when it comes to tax evasion in offshore jurisdictions, the ability of authorities to get information concerning tax evasion and illegal activities is becoming easier because of greater transparency and reliance on international treaties and agreements.

Unfortunately most taxpayers still think of the ATO as a “lumbering elephant” who hasn't learnt from its past mistakes and which is unable to determine the amount of tax evasion when it comes to offshore activities. In reality this couldn't be further from the truth as the ATO is now a very sophisticated organisation with real time computing and tracking facilities which enable it to pull up a full profile, including social networking sites, on any taxpayer anywhere at anytime it chooses to do so. The trap for many taxpayers is that by the time they come to the attention of the ATO it is already in possession of sufficient information indicating the taxpayer is non-compliant.

From an ATO perspective it is important to remember that where there is an issue of tax evasion the ATO is not constrained by any limitation of time to issue amended assessments and appropriate penalties for the tax shortfall involved. What most non-complying taxpayers and their advisers should be aware of is that the ATO is not confronted by any time constraints to locate non-compliant taxpayers. As a consequence if a taxpayer is non-compliant and this matter does not surface with the ATO for a number of years the penalties will be far more substantial particularly when consideration is given to the effects of compound interest. Delayed disclosure comes at a substantially increased cost including an increased risk of prosecution.

Conclusion

The ATO’s OVDI offers some significant benefits available for taxpayers who wish to take advantage of these benefits. However given the 30 June 2010 deadline time is rapidly running out for taxpayers to determine an appropriate course of action with respect to disclosure.  Furthermore taxpayers and their advisers will need to determine whether a “no name disclosure” or “named disclosure” course of action is appropriate.

Finally it is important to remember the OVDI initiative is not an amnesty and it is possible that compliance with the OVDI initiative does not guarantee a taxpayer immunity from a criminal prosecution.  Remember that both forms of disclosure rely upon the material being presented being full, frank and complete otherwise the ATO can disregard the OVDI and go straight to audit with the definite prospect of being criminally prosecuted as with Glen Wheatley and Tony Hili & Glynn Jones. This is not a game to be played out with amateurs. It may be the most important decision any taxpayer ever makes. Get proper informed tax advice from a recognised tax lawyer who specialises in this area. We have had and continue to enjoy great success in this area of practice. Do not forget that where any form of voluntary disclosure is made through any intermediary other than a lawyer everything is discoverable including all file notes and other materials prepared by your accountant in connection with this matter. In cases of fraud or evasion the accounting concession is worthless as has been repeatedly said by the Commissioner and confirmed by the High Court of Australia. 

If you have been questioned by the ATO or have any concerns with respect to making a voluntary disclosure about your onshore and or offshore income, then do not delay as now is the time to contact Mr Frank Egan from LAC Lawyers to discuss your options. Remember that after 30th of June 2010, “all bets are off” with respect to your utilising the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative.

 


 

[1] Australian Taxation Office website. www.ato.gov.au
 
 
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas