Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Taxation Law - Tax Havens, Operation Wickenby and the role of Professional Advisors

Date: February 01, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

Tax Havens and Banks

Even as the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI) had been announced on 30 November 2009 the ATO continued to step up its efforts to combat tax havens. On 14 April 2010 the Tax Office announced that it had requested information from a number of banks which it would use to identify Australian taxpayers who have not disclosed offshore income or over-claimed deductions involving international transactions.   The ATO also issued a gazettal notice setting out those financial institutions to which it was directed in Australia. Their intention was to receive information from the banks for the period from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2009 and to match it against their own data to identify people who may not have met their lodgment and payment obligations in Australia. Their aim was to identify people who are deliberately trying to conceal offshore income and assets. The ATO focus is concealment, hiding and/or disguising income and assets and/or over-claiming deductions through the blatant use of tax haven for no apparent reason.

OVDI – Voluntary Disclosure

Obviously the Tax Office was preparing itself for the post-30 June OVDI period.   The call on banks was to ensure that whoever came forward under the program that they would be given the published reductions in penalties and interest. Their aim was to get taxpayers to come forward and declare to the Tax Office what their true position was. They emphasized that all finalized disclosures made by taxpayers since the announcement included an assurance that no criminal investigations would be initiated provided hard-core criminal activity was not involved.

By making the call on the banks the ATO could check not only on those who came forward in terms of their true asset and income position but also to identify other taxpayers and entities who may have been tax non-compliant in a number of areas. The Commissioner emphasized that the offer would end on 30 June and that the concessional penalty arrangement for full disclosures would no longer be available after that time. He indicated that if the Tax Office discovered undeclared income through an audit process at a later date a much higher price would be paid, indicating that penalties could be as high as 90% and that they would seek criminal prosecution in serious cases. 

The Commissioner emphasised that the ATO had 25 taxation information exchange agreements in place with other countries the most recent being with Vanuatu and the Marshall Islands. Tax has taken a new turn, it was all about true transparency, international co-operation, reform of secrecy jurisdictions including tax havens and reducing the opportunity for non-compliant taxpayers to hide income and assets offshore.

Operation Wickenby

On the one hand the ATO was making an offer to all non-compliant taxpayers to come forward where they had income and assets overseas whilst at the same time vigorously pursuing non-compliant taxpayers who had not come forward under Operation Wickenby. There are four matters in point which are summarised in Parts (i) and (ii) of this article.

  • Sydney lawyer, Paul John Gregory was convicted by the Victorian Supreme Court for helping entertainment manager, Glen Wheatley, to move money offshore to avoid paying $194,000 in tax. The Australian Crime Commission’s focus was working with its partners to disrupt the activities of the principal organisers and facilitators behind these schemes including those overseas as well as the clients who directly profit from them. Once again this underscores the determination of all those involved in Operation Wickenby to hold responsible those who have assisted or participated in schemes or arrangements designed to defeat the Revenue.
  • Trevor Neil Thompson, a Perth accountant, was sentenced for conspiring to dishonestly cause a loss to the Commonwealth contrary to the Commonwealth Criminal Code between financial years 1991 and 2001. He was sentenced to 3 years and 3 months after pleading guilty to committing a $27M tax fraud.   You might say he was lucky because if he had decided to deny the obvious by claiming non-guilty then the sentence imposed would have been substantially greater.
    • The Australian Crime Commission said that “…. Mr Thompson illegally conspired with others to evade paying between $25.78M and $27.68M in tax involving a number of family trusts. Mr Thompson committed a criminal offence when he assisted his clients to deceive the Australian Taxation Office.”
Professionals – Accountants and Lawyers

The point was made, Accountants and Lawyers who help clients evade their tax responsibilities by using complicated, deceptive schemes such as this one, will be investigated and prosecuted. As has been said in other articles, the ATO focuses on three groups of people: promoters, professionals and participants. None of them will be excused where they are involved in hiding, disguising or concealing income and assets of any kind or description for and on behalf of any person or entity including themselves. Through the use of false documents Mr Thompson deliberately attempted to hide profits generated by his client’s business knowingly misleading the Australian Government to ensure his clients did not pay the required tax.

As the Commissioner said, “the ATO’s ability to trace funds around the world is constantly expanding as they are identifying transactions and participants in abusive, tax haven schemes.” As he said “this sentencing sends a clear message to participants and promoters of complex offshore schemes that they will face serious consequences if they attempt to deliberately avoid their obligations to the Australian community …”

Need to know more, call us today.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas