Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Taxation Law - The Year That was 2010 - Detection and Prosecution of Tax Offences

Date: January 28, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

Detection Techniques

The Commissioner indicated that these prosecutions ranged from offences such as failing to lodge to serious fraud including GST refund fraud. He pointed out that those who have been prosecuted now have to live with a criminal conviction against their name which is not worth it. He pointed out that the ATO has a range of ways to detect people who seek to avoid their taxation and superannuation responsibilities by not lodging returns through tax evasion or criminal fraud. Methods used include data matching, comparing third party information and analysing industry norms.

Last financial year the Tax Office conducted over 14,000 audits, reviews and investigations and close to 3,000 cases of tax non-compliance which were taken to court and successfully prosecuted. He indicated that they are relying upon sophisticated technology to detect organized activity, culminating in a number of scams. The message which is reinforcing is they rely upon with the ultimate aim being to ensure that Australia’s revenue is protected. Although they are tough on tax non-compliance they have a strong focus on helping honest taxpayers and they will assist those who are struggling to meet their tax obligations by engaging with the Tax Office to work out flexible payment arrangements so that no one loses. 

Prosecution Policy

The ATO has the power to prosecute a number of taxation offences with the most serious being referred to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP). Obviously these cases involve conduct which is outside the norm and on any measure has been engaged in to defeat the revenue. Serious cases which the ATO may refer to the CDPP include:

  1. defended cases;
  2. cases where a term of imprisonment is likely to be imposed;
  3. matters of public interest or where prominent or high-profile individuals or organizations are involved;
  4. prosecution of ATO employees;
  5. matters being investigated by the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Crime Commission or those being prosecuted by the CDPP;
  6. breaches of bonds or appeals against sentences.

Matters referred to the CDPP will only proceed where that Office is of the opinion that a criminal prosecution is in the best interests of the Commonwealth eg Meers’, Phillips’, Ronen’s, Wheatley’s and Hili & Jones’ cases. 

Prosecution Activities for 1st Quarter
  1. A NSW man was sentenced to 3½ years in prison with a non-parole period of two years after he was found guilty of GST fraud for submitting false BAS returns and trying to claim $500,000 as a company director.
  2. A Victorian woman was found guilty of four offences and sentenced to 20 months imprisonment subject to conditions. She was found guilty of GST fraud after lodging false BAS returns under three different ABNs and receiving $233,581 in refunds and attempting on a fourth occasion to make a claim for $132,058.
  3. A Sydney investment company, acting as a trustee for a superannuation fund was convicted and fined $100,000 for failing to comply with court orders to lodge income tax returns from 1999 to 2007 and $50,000 for failing to comply with court orders to provide information regarding member contribution statements for the fund. 
  4. A Sydney company was convicted and fined $40,000 for failing to comply with court orders to lodge quarterly BAS returns for the September 2005 – March 2009 period.

These matters demonstrate that the ATO is serious about detecting all types of tax non compliance compromising the taxation system including the failure to lodge all the way through to fraud and evasion. They do not care whether individuals or entities are involved as they are there to protect the revenue against abuses irrespective of the source of the tax non-compliance including the failure to comply with lawful directions and court orders. Sensible taxpayers will seek to avoid being taken to the public pillory and disgraced. The government and its agencies are cash-strapped and the ATO is now more accountable for collection of the revenue. Many will seek to escape the system but for those who get caught the consequences can be horrific. To put matters right it always costs time and money but with money which should have been paid as tax. Do not forget that GIC is currently running at 12.02% compound per annum and this is likely to increase with each tightening of the financial system by the Reserve Bank. The longer you leave it the worse it gets as do the consequences.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas