Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Taxation Law - The Year That was 2010 - Operation Wickenby, Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud

Date: January 28, 2011

Authors: Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)

Operation Wickenby, Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud in 2010

2010 was a very interesting year because it heralded a hardening of the approach taken by the ATO towards the collection of revenue on a world-wide basis. It might be remembered that with the onset of the GFC many of the initiatives that had been put in place by the ATO and other associated governmental agencies were sympathetically implemented. As everyone counted the damage it was suddenly realized that Australia was one of the golden halo economies and there was a significant change in attitude towards the collection of the revenue. In an attempt to square off the past the ATO introduced the overseas voluntary disclosure initiative on 30 November 2009 expiring on 30 June 2010. That initiative was designed to provide all non-complying taxpayers with an opportunity to declare their overseas income and capital gains irrespective of how they were held and to address any issues associated with over-claimed deductions.   Effectively what the ATO was saying was if you were not involved in hard-core criminal conduct then you could make an offshore voluntary disclosure without the fear of being criminally prosecuted. Whilst all of this was going on the system was readjusting from a compassionate approach to one where if the taxpayer did not take up opportunities provided to them to disclose their tax non-compliance then as the year moved on the ATO was heralding a much firmer and in some cases harsher approach to these taxpayers. 

Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud - A Tougher Approach in 2011

2011 will prove to be a very difficult year for many taxpayers particularly those who have entered into various types of onshore/offshore schemes or arrangements and have simply been involved in either tax evasion or taxation fraud. Obviously there are still opportunities available for people to come forward but they are not as generous as previous initiatives because they do not provide the same concessions with respect to penalties and interest. The ATO will use a variety of devices both to both detect and collect revenue including garnishees which have been the subject of a previous article. In order to understand the change of approach we have taken the time to list out for you some of the stepping stones taken by the ATO demonstrating their commitment to detection and collection irrespective of where taxpayers are currently located and the type of tax non-compliance involved. Their reach has been impressive as it includes everything from income tax and capital gains all the way through to superannuation. Taxation exploitation schemes or arrangements have been targeted as have promoters, professionals and participants. No one has been spared and every associated government agency has been utilised to encircle taxpayers and tighten the noose on those who have blatantly disregarded their taxation obligations.

Austrac will play an important role

Austrac has been busy mining data and passing information onto these agencies including the ATO. Very occasionally some of that data is questionable but it is almost at the level of insignificance. All financial transactions are being examined and at one time taxpayers could rely upon the fact that Austrac and other agencies would not look at financial transactions where the amount of money involved was $10,000 or less. As has been said in a previous article, data is being captured and transactions as small as $1,000 are of interest including the seriality of dealings involving these and greater amounts which have captured the attention of the ATO. A number of scams which amount to blatant frauds, taxation exploitation schemes or arrangements whatever you want to call them, have focused on micro-amounts the thinking being that they would always remain under the radar and therefore the likelihood of detection of taxpayers serially accessing debit and/or credit cards and/or the banking system would not be detected. This has all changed as the ATO now realizes that a husband and/or wife can withdraw $1,000 a day per person accessing $735,000 or more per annum. When looked at from this point of view that is no small amount of money and it has become so significant and the abuse so widespread that the ATO is targeting all such amounts with a tremendous amount of attention also being paid to the cash economy.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas