Thank you for all of your help. The service was outstanding - all of my questions were answered promptly, everything ran smoothly

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Taxation Law - The impact of TR 2010/3 on your business group - Re-characterisation of unpaid present earnings - Loans - Structuring

Date: January 06, 2011

Authors: LAC Lawyers

An Introduction to the Impact of TR 2010/3

On 2 June 2010, the Commissioner of Taxation’s views on the status of unpaid present entitlements (UPE) that are held by a private company and subsist along with the funds of an associated trust in the hands of a trustee was confirmed. 

This view was first expressed by the Commissioner by way of a draft taxation ruling (TR 2009/D8) and has now been confirmed by way of release of taxation ruling TR 2010/3.     

The Impact of TR 2010/3

Essentially, the result of TR 2010/3 (Ruling) is to bring any UPE of a private company that have been held by a trustee in an associated trust within the provisions of Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Act). 

The Ruling has a significant and far-reaching impact on the UPE of small to medium enterprises (SME) that often have in place a business structure whereby a private company is listed as a beneficiary of an associated trust. 

The trust deed typically provides for the private company as a beneficiary that is presently entitled to the income of the trust, along with other beneficiaries (which may include individuals). However, the funds are retained in the hands of the trustee in a trust structure and applied towards general commercial requirements of the private business such as business development and growth. Sometimes, the individual beneficiaries of the trust also receive private assets and therefore are subject only to the corporate tax rate. 

The Ruling means that such UPE may be classified as a deemed dividend by the Commissioner and therefore be subjected to the highest marginal rate of tax. To prevent such a scenario, it may be possible to establish the UPE as either a Section two or Section three Loan from the private company to the trust. 

Practically speaking, unless the Commissioner is convinced that this form of ‘financial accommodation’ from the private company to the trust is a genuine loan under Division 7A of the Act, the UPE will be treated as a deemed dividend received by the trust and taxable at the highest marginal rate.

The Ruling goes as far as providing that where any UPE is held for the benefit of any entity other than the private company, it may be considered a deemed dividend under Division 7A of the Act. 

When does the ruling take effect?

Although the Ruling applies retrospectively before 16 December 2009, in reality it will apply to UPE that have arisen on or after 16 December 2009.   

This Ruling means that private companies and its related entities must be cautious as to the choices they make when establishing a business structure. It is essential to seek out expert legal advice as to structuring your business and its interaction with related entities so to ensure that you are not only compliant with the ever-changing law, but also so to minimize your tax exposure. 

For advice about the impact of TR 2010/3 on your business contact LAC lawyers today on Sydney: 1300 799 888 or Melbourne 1300 734 638.

This article is intended only to provide a summary of the subject matter covered. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render legal advice. No reader should act on the basis of any matter contained in this article without first obtaining specific professional advice.

  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas