What Insurance Crisis - Is There Really One Following The Collapse Of HIH and FAI?
Date: February 12, 2006
Authors: LAC Lawyers
Many commentators have gone out of their way to suggest there was an insurance crisis and that it arose out of increased litigation, more successful claims and higher awarded damages which led to the unaffordability of public, products and professional indemnity insurance. There is no doubt that the liability market was a hyper-competitive one and the premiums were far too low and insurers lacked the discipline to apply or increase deductibles to assist them to manage smaller claims. Approximately 80% of all claims fell below $25,000 leaving 20% of all claims above this figure. Apart from this insurers were taking a hammering over workers compensation and compulsory third party claims now known as MAA matters. The eventual collapse of HIH/FAI and UMP provided insurers with an excuse to obtain government intervention.
There was little, if anything, insurers could do about workers compensation and compulsory third party premiums, given the commercial and political environment at the time. Irrespective the contrary was true for public, products and professional indemnity insurance where cashflow underwriting was rampant with insurers. It was common to hear insurers complaining about a soft market and their inability to do anything about it. Even those who complained continued to cut premiums to attract business as the market spiralled downward. Risk management was a catch cry from the whole of the insurance market with it being seen as a panacea by insurers for their problems. There is evidence which suggests a contradiction in the insurance industry's explanation of the insurance crisis which can be seen in data made available around the time of the implementation of the Civil Liability Act. The IPP Committee was constrained by time with the data only being selectively investigated as the panel did not consider it their job to test the accuracy of perceptions but rather see them as a starting point.
What is known is that when the 1997 year for liability claims was looked at there were 128 claims which were over $1M of which the vast majority were motor vehicle accident claims. What is also of interest is that with regards to the fuelling of the insurance crisis there is also evidence to suggest that in the case of community organisations 96% of them had never had a claim on public liability insurance in the past five years and yet premiums growth following the collapse was exponential and in some cases insurance became difficult or almost impossible to obtain e.g. real estate agents and valuers belong to a comprehensive scheme run by one of Australia's largest brokers in all states but Queensland, yet following the crisis the majority of these businesses found it almost impossible to obtain insurance however some were able to access the London market and secured insurance protection through it. There is no doubt that the court's pre-occupation with trying to find a remedy for everybody and award damages as a result impacted the insurance market, however, while all this was going on both brokers and insurers were doing little to help themselves. In some cases brokers were being savaged because they were accepting commissions from the business underwritten whereas others who charge fees were not so affected. Irrespective insurers did little to help themselves until the HIH/FAI and UMP collapses served to emasculate self absorption and cause them to focus on profitability rather than cashflow.
From the time of the IPP Committee's recommendations through the implementation of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) and the Civil Liability (Personal Responsibility) Act 2003 (NSW) it is possible to perceive that the government's ultimate goal in relation to negligence was to bring about change which imposed the burden of responsibility on individuals to take care of themselves and others in order to reduce liability and the level of damages awarded. There is now no doubt that where personal responsibility was once averted it is now the cornerstone of this legislation. Voluntary assumption of risk and contributory negligence now play an important part in this area. Although there has been some suggestion that insurance premiums are reducing this is only a recent phenomenon. Insurers have promoted the view that it is better for insureds to take up more of their self-insured retention by way of deductibles as it significantly reduces the overall premium charged. With public, products and professional indemnity, it is now being looked upon as disaster risk cover with insureds managing smaller risks themselves for both personal injury and property damage whereas in the past this was seen as being the insurer's responsibility.
Insurance Law - Rainstorm, Flood Insurance and Cyclone Insurance Claims - Part 1
Date: February 02, 2011
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
During December 2010 and January 2011, large areas of central and eastern Queensland have faced the full fury of nature in the form of devastating rain storm, flash flooding over land which is generally completely dry, and flood from overflowing watercourses being streams, rivers, lakes or reservoirs. In late January / early February, coastal Queensland is also being threatened by a category two and by a category 5 hurricane which might cause further damage to infrastructure, homes and businesses.
Insurance Law - Rainstorm, Flood Insurance and Cyclone Insurance Claims - Part 2
Date: February 02, 2011
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
The law in this area is complex. The precise policy wording needs to be taken into account and legal advice should be obtained. By way of general proposition only, the following statements maybe relevant.
Insurance Law - Rainstorm, Flood Insurance and Cyclone Insurance Claims - Part 3
Date: February 02, 2011
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
The Insurance Contract Act obliges insurers to particularly notify insured’s of what is regarded as an “unusual term” prior to the contract of insurance being entered into. If such notification does not take place, insurers cannot rely upon such an unusual term to deny a claim. To do so amounts to a breach of the duty of utmost good faith owed to insureds by insurers. The notification must amount to a description and explanation of the effect of the term rather merely than notifying the term itself.
Insurance Law - Queensland, New South Wales and Victorian Flood Claims - Part 1
Date: January 21, 2011
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
During the course of the current storm disaster catastrophic damage has been experienced in all of the eastern states of Australia. Interestingly we have all heard of estimates of $500M, $1B, $5B and now $20B from the ANZ’s economists. In other words the rebuilding costs for floods will be substantial. As the Queensland Premier says, the damage bill will be noteworthy and that 28,000 homes will need to be rebuilt at a cost of approximately $8B out of a total rebuilding cost of $20B.
Insurance Law - Queensland, New South Wales and Victorian Flood Claims - Part 2
Date: January 21, 2011
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
In all such cases where there has been catastrophic water damage through the incident of storm and/or flood it is obvious that the full benefits of an insurance policy are more fully available where the cause of the damage is storm. That is, even where an insured does not have the benefit of flood cover and they can rely upon their policy of insurance for storm cover they are far better off irrespective of the type of building damaged without extending the policy.
Insurance Law - New South Wales and Queensland Emergency Flood Claims
Date: January 06, 2011
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
Recently Eastern Australia has been swept by massive storms which have caused extensive storm and/or flood damage to both domestic and business establishments. The problem when it comes to flood damge is that many insureds fail to understand what their rights are and that under many policies flood damage is either not covered or only nominally.
Insurance Contracts Act - Changes to Insurance Law and Practice for Insureds, Insurers and Brokers
Date: August 02, 2010
Author(s): Michael Pickering B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., M. A.
Important amendments to the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Commonwealth) (“the ICA”) were expected to be passed by the Commonwealth Government in the Spring session of the 2010 Parliament. Their passage will now have to await the sitting of the new Parliament in late 2010.
Insurance Law - Product Liability
Date: May 10, 2010
Author(s): LAC Lawyers
Generally product liability in law refers to the responsibility or the liability of manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who produce and supply goods/products to the public which result in damages or injury caused by the use of a defective product.
Insurance Law and Business Interruption Insurance
Date: December 05, 2007
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
People in business insure their premises, contents and stock against the material damage risks of fire, explosion and other perils, but have they given the same thought to the other problems which would arise following any of these events, the problems which manifest themselves when the fire engines have driven away.
Insurance Law - Storm Claims and the Newcastle/Hunter Region
Date: June 21, 2007
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
Although underinsurance or the lack of insurance is a major problem for the community in both good and bad times its importance is critical in times of natural disasters including storms and cyclones. Every time there is a major storm either general or localised flooding is a problem.
What to expect when you call LAC Lawyers
Date: December 13, 2006
Author(s): LAC Lawyers
LAC Lawyers is a full service firm dedicated to the provision of superior legal services in Australia. Our aim is to provide unrivalled client satisfaction coupled with high quality service and advice. When you call LAC Lawyers our friendly reception staff will spend time with you to identify the area of law your enquiry relates to then pass you on to one of our qualified solicitor's who can help you.
Insurance Law - The different types of Insurance Claims and why they are sometimes denied
Date: October 09, 2006
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
Claims are often denied by insurers for a variety of reasons. They may have been denied for anything from non-disclosure of material fact through to fraud or over-capitalisation of loss. Interestingly, there has been a fundamental change over the last ten years in the approach taken by insurers with the denial of claims.
The Benefits of Hiring A Lawyer
Date: August 16, 2006
Author(s): LAC Lawyers
The old adage “you get what you pay for” is as true today as it has ever been.
Australian General Insurance Claims Practice
Date: August 02, 2006
Author(s): LAC Lawyers
Why stay with your lawyer
Date: August 01, 2006
Author(s): LAC Lawyers
The lawyer/client relationship is a personal one and there are many reasons which will dictate who you can and cannot work with. If you don’t like your lawyer, should you change? Ultimately, the relationship between a lawyer and client must be built on mutual trust.
Does The Duty of Utmost Good Faith Apply to Claims
Date: May 04, 2006
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
Originally the duty of utmost good faith was a common law concept which applied directly to contracts of insurance.
Claim Brokers
Date: May 02, 2006
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
Many corporate, commercial and business insureds shrug off the idea that they won’t get a fair deal from their insurer because of their buying power and they have an Insurance & Risk Manager, a Company Secretary/Finance Director and/or an Insurance Broker who are there to ensure this can’t and won’t happen. Think again.
Why Insurance Claims Are Not Paid
Date: May 02, 2006
Author(s): Frank Egan B.A., LL.B., A.C.L.A., F.T.I.A. (Notary)
What Impact Has Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Had On Damages and Personal Responsibility?
Date: February 12, 2006
Author(s): LAC Lawyers
Essentially the change has been profound as people are now required to look after themselves and take responsibility for their actions. The Civil Liability Act mainly deals with the question of damages whereas the amending Act deals with liability, but, with that said, the courts now pay proper respect for the concept of personal responsibility as required under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("the Act") and the Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2003 ("the Amending Act").