SMSF Law | Compliance Rules | Trust Law | LAC Lawyers Sydney & Melbourne Australia
  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies

SMSF - Compliance Rules - Compliance with Trust Law Generally

Compliance with trust law generally

The requirement that a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) must comply with general trust law as well as the compliance rules specific to SMSFs means that SMSF members must take into account considerations beyond just the SMSF rules themselves.

The general trust rules are scattered throughout common law, but the more relevant and commonly cited rules include the following:

  • the trustee must be familiar with the terms of the deed. In the case of an SMSF, this means that the trustees or the directors of the corporate trustee must be familiar with the SMSF deed;
  • the trustee must act impartially between the beneficiaries. In an SMSF, all the members of the SMSF are also its trustees (or directors of the corporate trustee). It is important that all SMSF members act impartially for the benefit of all the SMSF members rather than for themselves;
  • the trustee must keep proper accounts. It is not acceptable for SMSF trustees to buy property without keeping track of exactly what the SMSF holds (and without proper account of whether members hold the property as individuals or as trustees of the fund);
  • connected with the above is the obligation of the trustees not to mix assets of the SMSF with their own funds; and
  • trustee actions must be unanimous. If there are multiple SMSF trustees, for example, one trustee cannot be ignored if they object to an action by the others.

Note, however, that where trust laws appear to conflict with SMSF laws, the SMSF laws override the trust laws.

Example: Breach of trust law

F, G and H are quarrelsome brothers who set up an SMSF with themselves as sole members and individual trustees. They get a lawyer to draft an excellent trust deed, and they formulate an investment strategy that accords with SMSF requirements.

Their investments are well-chosen, their transactions are at arm’s length, and the sole purpose test is never breached. All other SMSF rules are complied with.

However, in the course of existence of the SMSF, F, G and H do the following:

  • they jointly purchase a property in Greenacres NSW, and intend that the property should be funded and held partly by themselves as individuals and partly by themselves as trustees. However, they do not write down what the proportion of holding should be, and the certificate of title only mentions their individual names and not the SMSF; and
  • F and G make a decision for the SMSF to purchase shares in a high-risk investment. H disagrees with their decision, so F and G hold a meeting without him and decide unanimously to invest in this high-risk investment.

In this case, F, G and H have breached general trust law. They have failed to keep their assets separate from those of the SMSF. Further, they have failed to act unanimously and have failed to act impartially between the beneficiaries.

(Note that the partial funding of a property by the SMSF and themselves as individuals also potentially breaches SMSF laws, depending on whether the SMSF’s portion of the property is put at risk of recourse).

Conclusion

If you would like to know whether your SMSF satisfies the general trust law rules, call LAC today on 1300 799 888 (Sydney) or 1300 734 638 (Melbourne).

  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies