SMSF Law | Superannuation Benefits | LAC Lawyers Sydney & Melbourne Australia
  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies

SMSF - New arrangements under an instalment warrant

A common issue with self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) which enter limited recourse borrowing arrangements (better known as instalment warrants) is at what point changes to the original arrangement can result in a new arrangement.

When instalment warrants change into a new arrangement

It will sometimes occur that an SMSF will be obliged to change its instalment warrants in some way. The following are situations where such changes can result in a new arrangement:

  • capitalisation of interest through a drawdown from a credit facility, even if the original instalment warrant explicitly contemplated capitalisation;
  • refinancing of the original instalment warrant unless the original instalment warrant explicitly contemplated refinancing in this manner;
  • any borrowing inconsistent with the agreed instalment warrant; and
  • changes to membership of the SMSF.

If an instalment warrant transforms into a new arrangement, then it is necessary for the SMSF to determine whether the new arrangement is itself permitted under SMSF instalment warrant requirements. Note that it will also be necessary to determine whether other SMSF compliance rules are breached.

Example: Instalment warrant changes into a new arrangement

K and L are the only members and individual trustees of a certain SMSF. They get involved in an instalment warrant for their SMSF, setting up a bare trust to hold a property and getting financing for the property in the usual manner.

Under the terms of the instalment warrant, the bank agrees to fund the SMSF’s acquisition of the property. The SMSF has a beneficial interest in the property, and will gain legal title to the property upon paying seven instalment payments.

However, K and L have difficulty meeting the SMSF instalment payments. The bank relents and agrees to extend the repayment to ten payments rather than seven. This sort of extension was already covered by the terms of the original agreement.

K and L then recapitalise part of the interest on the repayments, as the SMSF is still having difficulties repaying. This recapitalisation was also within the contemplation of the original agreement.

In this case, the refinancing does not result in a new arrangement. The sort of refinancing that occurred was exactly contemplated in the terms of the original agreement. However, the recapitalisation does result in a new arrangement. Even though it was also contemplated by the original agreement, recapitalisation using a drawdown always results in a new arrangement.

K and L will thus have to determine whether the SMSF’s borrowing still satisfies the requirements of the SMSF instalment warrant provisions.

Conclusion

If you have concerns about your SMSF and whether its instalment warrant arrangement has been changed into a new arrangement, call LAC Lawyers and we can provide advice and assistance.  

 

  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies