SMSF Law | Arm's Length Rule | LAC Lawyers Sydney & Melbourne Australia
  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies

SMSF and the Arm's Length Rule

All investments of a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) ought to be at arm’s length, or if not at arm’s length must be no more favourable to the other party than would be reasonable for an arm’s length transaction.

An important issue is whether the other party, not the SMSF, is the entity being favoured.

Example: SMSF is favoured by transaction

S, T and U are brothers and trustee-members of an SMSF. They decide that they would like the SMSF to invest in a block of land belonging to their father.

S, T and U’s father offers to sell the block of land to the SMSF. He offers to sell it to the SMSF at below its market value. S, T and U are eager for this to take place, but they still worry about the arm’s length rule.

In this situation, the transaction is not at arm’s length. However, it is likely that the transaction would not breach the arm’s length rule. This is because the transaction is more favourable to the SMSF than would be an arm’s length transaction. The way the rule is breached is if the transaction favours the other party (here, the father).

(Note that this result does not mean that the SMSF is compliant. Other rules may be breached because of this transaction, for example the sole purpose test and the investment strategy rule).

Conclusion

If you are concerned that your SMSF might be entering non arm’s length transactions, call LAC today on 1300 799 888 (Sydney) or 1300 734 638 (Melbourne).

 

  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies