SMSF Law | Superannuation Benefits | LAC Lawyers Sydney & Melbourne Australia
  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies

SMSFs and Early Release of Superannuation Benefits

The sole purpose test requires strict compliance. Unfortunately, many actions by a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) will breach the sole purpose test.

One common breach of the sole purpose test involves the early release of superannuation benefits to members.

Then an individual with an SMSF is in some financial trouble, they will often turn their mind towards accessing the monies in the fund. After all, in a way it is their money.

Such an impulse, of course, conflicts with the fundamental purpose of superannuation, which is to compel individuals to set aside funds earlier in life to provide for their retirement. Therefore, the restrictions upon early release of SMSF benefits are strict.

The ground of early release that is sought by most individuals in financial trouble is that of severe financial hardship. Severe financial hardship is defined in terms of whether the individual has been receiving Commonwealth income-support payments and is unable to meet immediate family living expenses.

In the recent past there have been press releases from the ATO warning against promoters who offer SMSF members the chance to withdraw their superannuation early. Whether or not promoters are involved, early withdrawal of superannuation can result in severe sanctions.

Example: What is severe financial hardship?

U is the sole member and trustee of her SMSF. Her SMSF invests in shares and bonds, and has been highly successful.

However, the rest of U’s financial life has been less than successful. She was severely hit by the global financial crisis personally, through the virtual collapse of her book-selling business. She has been receiving Commonwealth income-support payments for nine months. She also suffers from chronic pain and really needs medical treatment.

U requires money to pay for the following:

  • $5,000 to pay for surgery to treat her chronic pain;
  • $2,000 to pay for repairs to the front of her house, which is becoming dangerously dilapidated, to the extent of endangering passers-by;
  • $1,000 in educational expenses; and
  • $240 to pay for three speeding tickets.

U casts around for a source of finance. Her attention is drawn to the fact that her SMSF is highly successful and contains a large quantity of funds that she wants to access. She therefore applies for early withdrawal of SMSF funds.

In this case, U has been receiving Commonwealth income-support payments for sufficient time to classify her as being in severe financial hardship. However, the expenses she wishes to fund with SMSF monies must be “reasonable and immediate family living expenses”.

Here, the educational expenses and speeding tickets are unlikely to constitute such expenses. However, the cost of surgery and the repairs to a dangerously dilapidated building have, in the past, been deemed to constitute “immediate” expenses.

Conclusion

If you are contemplating the early withdrawal of SMSF funds, or if you have already withdrawn funds early and are anxious about compliance, then call LAC today on 1300 799 888 (Sydney) or 1300 734 638 (Melbourne).

  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. FAQs
  4. Lawyers
  5. Case Studies